Yes. We integrate with established SIS platforms so enrolment, attendance, grades, and fee status stay consistent across systems. We also support LTI for third-party courseware, which lets institutions add tools without duplicating student records.

We build to WCAG 2.2 AA — semantic structure, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, sufficient contrast, and captioning for video. Accessibility is designed in from the first wireframe, because retrofitting it into a finished platform is considerably harder and rarely as complete.

Yes. We build assessment engines supporting multiple question types, timed attempts, randomised banks, and automated plus manual grading. Where remote invigilation is required we integrate established proctoring providers rather than building surveillance tooling ourselves.

We design the data model around least privilege — staff see only the records their role requires, parent and guardian access is scoped to their own children, and retention rules are explicit. Consent handling and audit logging are built in, with FERPA and COPPA expectations informing the architecture.